Blog Posts in "science"

Stupidity Breeds Stupidity

Posted at 11:36:00 on Sat, May 06th 2006 by graham
in: ranting science

"Your species has the most amazing capacity for self-deception, matched only by it's ingenuity when trying to destroy itself." ~The Seventh Doctor, Remembrance of the Daleks
The human race never fails to dismay me at times. Like when, following an amusing snippet in this week's New Scientist's Feedback section, I chanced to read the reviews of a very daft book indeed - "Who Built the Moon?" By Christopher Knight and Alan Butler. Here's a sample from the Amazon blurb:
The Moon has confounded scientists for many years. It does not obey the known rules of astrophysics and there is no coherent theory of its origin - in fact, it should not really be there... Higher life only developed on Earth because the Moon is exactly what it is and where it is. Whern all of the facts are dispassionately reviewed, it becomes unreasonable to cling to the idea that the Moon is a natural object. The only question that remains is, "Who built it"?
Now, I'm well aware that people like to take leave of their senses every once in a while and believe things that have no basis in fact. I'm also well aware that people like to rebel against what they've been taught all their lives and will, for the sake of said rebellion, argue any old tripe that they happen to come across with spurious logic like "The moon and the sun look exactly the same size from the surface of the Earth. That can't be a coincidence!" (heard that one before, but it's particularly apt here). What dismays me most is that people actually read this stuff and think it to be true and, what's more accept it without any kind of rational argument whatsoever. Moreover - and this really takes the biscuit - they argue that received wisdom about whatever they're reading about has no basis in rational fact (because the book tells them so) and therefore, because someone comes up with a half thought-out argument against it, must be untrue. What happened to thinking for yourself? What happend to questioning what you're told instead of just blindly accepting it like a docile schoolchild? When I was studying, well, anything very much, we were always taught to question, question, question everything. It doesn't matter if it says it in a textbook, it could still be bunk. Review the evidence. We did and, of course, what it said in the textbook usually turned out to be true (for a given value of true, usually watered down for the sensitive brains of people who would be told at the next level of education that the simplification they had been taught at the previous one had been a lie), but sometimes it wasn't so cut and dried, so we debated it. Yet people all over the world will accept this kind of spurious bullshit just because it says it on the printed page. And yes, this infuriates me. Yes, I've lost some friends in the past by expecting people to think about things. But come on. We've managed to take over (and royally fuck up) this planet. We've crossed the oceans, we've developed the means to fly, we've sent men to the moon for fuck's sake. Can't people at least engage the few pounds of porridge between their ears for few seconds and just think every once in a while?

Good.

Posted at 21:32:00 on Tue, December 20th 2005 by graham
in: in the news nature science

BBC News: 'Intelligent design' teaching ban

A court in the US has ruled against the teaching of "intelligent design" alongside Darwin's theory of evolution.

How it Happened, According to Isaac

Posted at 20:03:00 on Mon, November 07th 2005 by graham
in: humour in the news science thoughts writing

I don't normally go in for posting other authors' work, but I thought I ought to share this because, though I'm a great Asimov fan, I'd never read it before and also because I came to read it via /. and that almost automagically makes it worth sharing.

I came upon this story after reading an article about how the Vatican has said that the theory of evolution is perfectly acceptable as long as the bible was "read correctly."

Here's Asimov's version of events:

HOW IT HAPPENED by Isaac Asimov

My brother began to dictate in his best oratorical style, the one which has the tribes hanging on his words.

"In the beginning," he said, "exactly fifteen point two billion years ago, there was a big bang and the Universe--"

But I had stopped writing. "Fifteen billion years ago?" I said incredulously. "Absolutely," he said. "I'm inspired."

"I don't question your inspiration," I said. (I had better not. He's three years younger than I am, but I don't try questioning his inspiration. Neither does anyone else or there's hell to pay.) "But are you going to tell the story of Creation over a period of fifteen billion years?"

"I have to," said my brother. "That's how long it took. I have it all here," he tapped his forehead, "and it's on the very highest authority."

By now I had put down my stylus. "Do you know the price of papyrus?" I said. "What?" (He may be inspired but I frequently noticed that the inspiration didn't include such sordid matters as the price of papyrus.

I said, "Suppose you describe one million years of events to each roll of papyrus. That means you'll have to fill fifteen thousand rolls.

You'll have to talk long enough to fill them and you know that you begin to stammer after a while. I'll have to write enough to fill them and my fingers will fall off. And even if we can afford all that papyrus and you have the voice and I have the strength, who's going to copy it? We've got to have a guarantee of a hundred copies before we can publish and without that where will we get the royalties from?"

My brother thought a while. He said, "You think I ought to cut it down?"

"Way down," I said, "if you expect to reach the public."

"How about a hundred years?" he said.

"How about six days?" I said.

He said, horrified, "You can't squeeze Creation into six days."

I said, "This is all the papyrus I have. What do YOU think?"

"Oh well," he said, and began to dictate again, "In the beginning -- does it have to be six days, Aaron?"

I said, firmly, "Six days, Moses."

News from Deutschland

Posted at 08:06:00 on Tue, April 26th 2005 by graham
in: humour in the news nature science

I'm barely struggling out of my early morning torpor at the moment but I thought that I should share this with you as soon as possible.

According to recent media reports, the Altona district of Hamburg is currently being afflicted by a plague of exploding toads.

According to the WikiPedia Entry:

...numerous toads in the district have been observed by nature protection officials to swell up with gasses and explode, propelling their innards for distances of up to three metres. These incidents have prompted local residents to refer to the area's lake - home to the toads - as "Tümpel des Todes" (Pool of Death).

And with that pleasant image fixed firmly in your heads, I'll let you get about your day.

Creative Licence

Posted at 13:08:00 on Fri, April 15th 2005 by graham
in: science

New shuttle tank ready for lift-off

"The [Columbia] accident showed that the tank's foam insulation, necessary to keep the shuttle's exotic rocket propellants as cold as minus 217 Celsius (-423 Fahrenheit)"

Except that the fuel stored in the tank isn't exotic in any way, shape or form. It's liquid oxygen (in the forward half of the tank) and liquid hydrogen (in the aft half). Put basically, for those who hadn't spotted it, it's water, plain and simple, just split into its component elements.

You've got to love journalists. And you have to wonder just how much this kind of creative licence on the part of science reporters is responsible for getting people interested in science in the first place. I mean, if it read "hydrogen and oxygen" or even "water" as opposed to "exotic fuels", just how many people would find that immediately intriguing do you think?

Perhaps we need someone to do the same for politics. Now that would be interesting.

Search

Latest Twitter

New blog post Twitters for 2008-08-19 http://tinyurl.com/572syb 2008-08-20 01:15:21 (More)

Recent entries

Launchpad Bugs

Post Categories

10mm 15th of july upload amusing animals atheism august9upload august 9 upload autoportrait bass bbc bird blackandwhite blogging blogs buildings canonical caton church colourised computing cricket d300 d40x desaturated django editing flickr flower forestofbowland from the inbox funny general heysham home humour in the news lancashire lancaster landscape launchpad links linux london lune may 12th upload me monochrome morecambe morecambebay music nanowrimo nature news new site night norfolk norfolkbroads novel novel-the-second observations pendle people photography podcasts posts that started out differently programming python quotes ranting reading reflection religion science sea selfportrait sepia shadows sigma1020mm silliness sky stupidity sunset texture thoughts three hundred and sixty-odd days of 2008 travel tree twitter ubuntu warren ellis, internet jesus water work writing writing ideas

About

Graham Binns is a writer, photographer, musician and software developer from Lancaster, England, with far too much hair, a penchant for odd t-shirts and a magnificent hat. He has been making things up for as long as he can remember and has been making code work for long enough to make a living from it.

He has written one novel, which is in the process of composting, and is working remembering how to write before embarking on a second. In the meantime, he photographs things, since it's easier not to have to make the world up in his head all of the time.

From the gallery

Corners No entry Tramway Smash Wasteland