Blog Posts in "quotes"

The first step

Posted at 22:03:54 on Mon, June 11th 2007 by graham
in: blogs doctor who novel-the-second quotes seth godin writing

Seth Godin sums up the starting-a-story problem perfectly:

That Moment

When you are sitting right on the edge of something daring and scary and creative and powerful and perhaps wonderful... and you blink and take a step back. That's the moment. The moment between you and remarkable. Most people blink. Most people get stuck. All the hard work and preparation and daring and luck is nothing compared with the ability to not blink.

A couple of nights ago, without really realising what I was doing, I wrote the opening paragraphs for novel-the-second, or at least something like them. And looking at the above quote I realise: I've already taken the first step. Now its just a matter of putting the words on the paper. No excuses.

Whatever you do, don't blink (with apologies to Steven Moffat).

On Outlining

Posted at 14:18:00 on Sun, January 28th 2007 by graham
in: quotes writing

Zadie Smith on Reading

Posted at 11:12:00 on Sat, November 18th 2006 by graham
in: quotes reading writing

For the Fallen

Posted at 11:48:00 on Fri, November 11th 2005 by graham
in: in the news observations quotes

They shall not grow old as we that are left grow old; Age will not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun, and in the morning We will remember them.

I stood in Market Square, outside the old Lancaster Town Hall, and I bowed my head as the clock struck eleven and the standards were lowered. The bugler, an old man who had walked across the square earlier on two crutches, hunched and weatherbeaten, played the Last Post. His back was ramrod straight, his eyes bright, his lay sticks forgotten behind him.

It was eerie, that silence. It always is. On every single Armistice Day that I can remember, I have fancied that in my mind's ear I can hear the sound of big guns, the cries of the wounded and the dying, and the awful quiet that comes after.

I stood with the men and women and listened as the last post faded away. Another man, in the centre of the museum steps, spoke the words that we have all heard, reading that famous verse from For the Fallen: We will remember them.

The reveille played as the silence ended, the standards were once again held aloft, and the man in the centre of the steps thanked us for observing the silence and for being so generous with our donations to the poppy appeal.

Afterwards, as the crowd was drifting away, I happened to walk past a group of veterans. I stopped.

"Excuse me," I said. They turned to me. Their eyes were bright with tears. They had been remembering those who they were not standing with today.

"I just wanted to say thank you," I said.

They looked almost puzzled.

"For being there," I said, "for doing what you did."

They nodded. One by one, I shook their hands.

I do not have the words to describe the debt of gratitude that we owe every last serviceman and woman, the ones who died, the ones who live, the ones who did not fight but worked to keep others alive, supplied and able to fight for their country and their cause.

There are those who would say that we should not observe Armistice Day. It glorifies war, they tell us, makes heroes out of politicians who killed thousands with a single decision.

Once again, I find myself without the words to express myself. So, as I often do, I shall turn to the words of a friend:

I have stood in the trenches, watched the wind move the poppies on the Somme, walked along the beaches in Normandy and seen rows upon rows upon rows upon rows of perfectly maintained white crosses. I have heard the last post played on every cold, grey windswept November 11th as far back as I can remember and have shed a tear on every single one. There is no glory standing at the cenotaph in the rain, only somber, humble silence and overwhelming sorrow. You are faced with the consequences of humanity at it's worst and give thanks for the freedoms you enjoy and the choices you can make to ensure it never happens again.

We will remember them.

In Flanders fields the poppies blow Between the crosses, row on row That mark our place; and in the sky The larks, still bravely singing, fly Scarce heard amid the guns below. We are the Dead. Short days ago We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow, Loved and were loved, and now we lie In Flanders fields. Take up our quarrel with the foe: To you from failing hands we throw The torch; be yours to hold it high. If ye break faith with us who die We shall not sleep, though poppies grow In Flanders fields. ~ John McCrae
With proud thanksgiving, a mother for her children, England mourns for her dead across the sea. Flesh of her flesh they were, spirit of spirit, Fallen in the cause of the free. Solemn the drums thrill: Death august and royal Sings sorrow up into immortal spheres. There is music in the midst of desolation And a glory that shines upon our tears. They went with songs to the battle, they were young, Straight of limb, true of eye, steady and aglow. They were staunch to the end against odds uncounted, They fell with their faces to the foe. They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old; Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn. At the going down of the sun and in the morning We will remember them. They mingle not with laughing comrades again; They sit no more at familiar tables of home; They have no lot in our labour of the day-time; They sleep beyond England's foam. But where our desires are and our hopes profound, Felt as a well-spring that is hidden from sight, To the innermost heart of their own land they are known As the stars are known to the Night; As the stars that shall be bright when we are dust, Moving in marches upon the heavenly plain, As the stars that are starry in the time of our darkness, To the end, to the end, they remain. ~ Laurence Binyon

Wind in my Espresso

Posted at 20:56:00 on Sun, July 31st 2005 by graham
in: humour in the news quotes writing

As I posted earlier Terry Pratchett has written a letter to The Times which, at base, asks a very simple question: Why is it that there are so many good fantasy authors and yet the only one that the media seems to think is worth paying attention to is a Ms J.K. Rowling? And while you're at it, why can't you try quoting correctly the people that you're reporting about?

The reason that I didn't post the the link to the BBC News article was that the headline of it was "Pratchett Anger at Rowling's Rise." As most of us would probably say after reading Mr Pratchett's letter, that's not what he was trying to express. Once again the media have gone for snappy headline instead of "Terry Pratchett wants to know why the media only has eyes for one fantasy author and can't get their facts straight whilst they're at it?"

I would have posted more opinion earlier, but I thought I'd wait and see what Neil Gaiman, Terry Pratchett's friend and co-author of Good Omens would have to say about matters, since it was almost doubtless that he would have had a deluge of email about the matter.

Which of course he did.

The full post is worth reading, but I'll cut out the salient bits in the hope of giving you the general gist of things without doing the media's trick of stripping every quote of its context and twisting it until its intentions bleed.

I read the Time article and thought it was astonishingly badly written and worse researched. The bit that puzzled me the most was that I remembered interviews with Ms. Rowling where she loved the Narnia books (it was a few seconds of Googling to find a 1998 Telegraph interview where, "Even now, if I was in a room with one of the Narnia books I would pick it up like a shot and re-read it." as opposed to the Time version of "Rowling has never finished The Lord of the Rings. She hasn't even read all of C.S. Lewis' Narnia novels, which her books get compared to a lot. There's something about Lewis' sentimentality about children that gets on her nerves." The version of the history of "fantasy" that the article's writer paints is utter bollocks, and I assume Terry decided that needed to be said. I didn't see it as a swipe at Ms Rowling, though, but as a swipe against lazy journalists - but "Pratchett Anger At Shoddy Journalism" is a much less exciting headline than the one the BBC came up with.

So rather than being the literary bitch fight that the Beeb painted it to be, this was really a media-stirred storm in a teacup based on a misrepresentation of part of a letter that someone (who just happened to be one of the world's most successful living authors) wrote to the Times in order to point out yet another instance of shoddy journalism. In fact it wasn't even a storm in a teacup. It was more a slight breeze in an Espresso thimble.

Update [03/08/2005]

Neil Gaiman, who is strangely omniscient about the contents of t'interweb - I suspect that his myriad fans also act as spies and informants on the goings on on websites the world over - has pointed out that the original BBC Article has now been revised into a much milder format:

I note that the BBC article formerly entitled PRATCHETT ANGER AT ROWLING'S RISE has now transmuted into a much milder article entitled Pratchett takes swipe at Rowling, which no longer accuses Terry of very much at all, apart from "poking fun". It starts out: "Writer Terry Pratchett has poked fun at Harry Potter author JK Rowling for saying she did not realise she was writing a fantasy novel. He wrote to the Sunday Times:"I would have thought that the wizards, witches, trolls, unicorns, hidden worlds... would have given her a clue?"" and doesn't really get any further than that, really. This replaces the previous opening gambit of: "Author Terry Pratchett has complained that the status of Harry Potter author JK Rowling is being elevated "at the expense of other writers". Pratchett, one of the UK's most successful novelists with 40 million books sold, said the media ignores the achievements of other fantasy authors. He also took a sideswipe at Rowling for saying she did not realise Harry Potter was fantasy until it was published."

I wonder what editorial process at the BBC occurred for that to happen?

Search

Latest Twitter

In Arrochar, Scotland. Living near the bones of the earth. 2008-08-26 21:19:22 (More)

Recent entries

Launchpad Bugs

Post Categories

10mm 15th of july upload amusing animals atheism august9upload august 9 upload autoportrait bass bbc bird blackandwhite blogging blogs buildings canonical caton church colourised computing cricket d300 d40x desaturated django editing flickr flower forestofbowland from the inbox funny general heysham home humour in the news lancashire lancaster landscape launchpad links linux london lune may 12th upload me monochrome morecambe morecambebay music nanowrimo nature news new site night norfolk norfolkbroads novel novel-the-second observations pendle people photography podcasts posts that started out differently programming python quotes ranting reading reflection religion science sea selfportrait sepia shadows sigma1020mm silliness sky stupidity sunset texture thoughts three hundred and sixty-odd days of 2008 travel tree twitter ubuntu warren ellis, internet jesus water work writing writing ideas

About

Graham Binns is a writer, photographer, musician and software developer from Lancaster, England, with far too much hair, a penchant for odd t-shirts and a magnificent hat. He has been making things up for as long as he can remember and has been making code work for long enough to make a living from it.

He has written one novel, which is in the process of composting, and is working remembering how to write before embarking on a second. In the meantime, he photographs things, since it's easier not to have to make the world up in his head all of the time.

From the gallery

Corners No entry Tramway Smash Wasteland